>>8603064

for each bread you get a different ID is my understanding of it.

so if you find the same id in a different bread, it's not the same anon (or it could be but there is no way to prove it)

if you have a trip code then one can verify a name associated with it.

that is how we know when Q posts. And also, Q can post with different ID's in the same bread. Or even not with a name and with a name with the same ID.

if Q posts without a trip, and then posts with one, using the same ID, then the rule is that the one without the ID does not get put into the Q posts at the head of the bread.

>>8603054

this is a channel, so the nautical metaphor is always appropriate here.

and there have always been boatfags, too.

>>8603259

happens a lot.

the most recent was just the other day when Q posted in the UK bread. (was that yesterday?)

and there was another post from Q from a few months ago.

the Q post from the other day:

>>8573290 (thursday)

if you go to that post you will find another Q post in that bread.

there was a time that Q posted without a trip, and someone called Q a new fag. Maybe someone will post a screen cap of that day.

that was around the time when Q was testing out posting from different devises and made the rule about not putting the trip coded posts at the head of the bread.

>>8603324

. . not putting the non-trip-coded posts . . .

non trip coded do not get noted at the head of bread.

Boring shill should just go back to being anon.

follow . . . . . . . if you want to find out how to be interesting, even if you sometimes are a bit full of your self with bluster and verminous outrage!

I don't mention his name, but he recently got back in the pod cast game. He's still full of shit some of the time. But at least he's convincing as a real person.

even if he might be an AI.

boring shill

caution, don't hit your head if you fall asleep and topple over . . .

>>8603397

right in front of the beach where a lot of Military members might have been able to observe it on a beautiful Saturday.