———
Last Bake moved too Quickly. Couldn’t verify and post
>>8608745 (lb)
>>8608570 (lb)
>>8608846 (lb)
>>8608875 (lb)
>>8608866 (lb)
Baker, I’m trying to confirm these Twitter backgrounds. So far they check out.
It’s possible in the Twitter code that the Class Libraries have Objects that manage the background image that have a default setting that has random “bland” RBG values.
The look up tables (LUT) could have been goofed up in a end of Sprint set of DevOps pipeline tests.
If not, well then Something’s Up
Baker: Suggest that you group those that check and those that don’t in the Next Bread
>But why Chuck Grassley? Confusing.
>May have to reorg this section of notables in new bake since this is moving too fast. TY
==Umm…I’d like to make a motion Sir, that this all be a Notable”