>>8619212

I picked a side.

>>8619272

Rethinking it to what though? Bernie? Hi11ary? Bidan?

If this is disinfo, it's been going on for many years. Following the craziness since 0bama times, things seem to be lining up for GESARA, foiling NWO, resetting government and culture. The introduction of Q filled in and broadened the information available about all this stuff. Once brought to light, it is impossible to ignore.

>>8619307

The bad actors are exposing themselves.

>>8619315

"According to The Courier-Mail, officials feared Trump was preparing to tweet about Hanks' health"

"Officials". Official what? Propagandists?

>>8619422

Great. There's still nothing about knowing that Trump was planning to tweet about Hanx. WTF? Someone got it into their head to try to make POTUS look stupid, (probably some deepstater in the Aus. Embassy) and started worriedly asking pointed questions. Boop. There's your "official" seeking assurances.

>>8619528

>>8619659