>>8620674

>>8620701

>>8620733

>>8609045 (lb)

>>8609082 (lb)

“QAniggas”? You sound like my kids with that one.

Anyway, thanks for the work on this. Spent a bunch of time searching this out during yesterday’s Night Shift. Here are some others. Verified Grassley and Prosobiec. Yates would not be a white hat.

Some Anons dismissed all this yesterday. Others followed some of my line of thinking. I assumed it might have been an glitch in the end of Sprint testing in the Object library for the Background image database LUT. Others thought it was a standard issue with the Background Image Server.

>Still waiting for a decent explanation not tied to the Color Code characteristics list.

>>8620793

If you are the one that put this together…

Big Time Shout Out, Anon

>Keep up the great work.

Of course, if we took Q’s advice we’d see them as lost souls who were probably trained by non free thinkers throughout High School and College and maybe even at home. They are meant to be Rescued.

The Poster helps Enumerate Sins of Liberalness and Catalyze their Return to Light from the Dark

>>8621050

>>8621028

It’s true. I’m an old fart.

Been diggin for a long time. Besides the official work assessments and “audits”, here’s a few oldies done on own time: 1994 (Clinton Dossier), pre-Y2k tomfoolery, 2006-7 Obama digs (way cool and may soon be brought up again), Benghazi fiasco (Stand down orders, No support needed to Ambassador, etc), and more. Our research tools were pretty minimal in the early days. These new tools are great!

>So thanks for joining up with us old-ish Patriots, you young punks (spoken with Anon respect, of course).

BTW, without my prodding…

My adult Kids are now into Q

>>8620957

Kudos to your style of digging.

The kiddos can learn much from you.

>>8620923

>>8621060

Right now, all I’d like is an decent explanation for just three people gone grey:

Chuck Grassley, Trey Gowdy, Devin Nunes

>Public officials who have busted their collective butts to get to the bottom (pun intended) of this crap (pun really intended).

Plus throw in a little John Solomom for some journalistic spice!

>Tell us what’s up guys!

>>8621064

Is that why I still have an GREY avatar loaded on some of my accounts for picture ID?

>Oh, I’m so Relieved. I’m just as equal as any other lazy, non-creative, chummy faced, don’t-want-to-be identified person.

My pronouns are Blah/Bland/Baa

>Sorry, Night Shift sarcasm or lightheadedness

>>8621348

>>8621278

Don’t pick on these guys too much. They do teach about an very old time mafioso like Indian gang (Gadianton Robbers).

>>8621420

Agree with the White House.