>>8623775

newfags, lurkers

if you think its notable but others dont - they are clowns and are hiding info

if you think its not but others do - they are clowns and are pushing disinfo

and always argue with the spam posts

and pic related is how to tantrum

>>8623786

thanks WnB

see you tonight when you pop in and lurk

>>8623798

much nice

>>8623815

2 notable nominations

you get filtered, Rainman

try and keep up

>>8623835

when i posted that i didnt even know about the EPA post last bread

i have issue with your logic

reread my statement:

you think its notable but others dont - they are clowns and are hiding info

you think its not but others do - they are clowns and are pushing disinfo

reconciled:

its all about you

and then you bitch accordingly

regarding the EPA post

2 notable noms is pretty legit even for an anon opine

note that you get filtered, you glow, you are easy to spot and are worthless to the pursuit of logic on this board

you are a puny imbecile with shit logic and even shittier rapport

you are a low tier, low grade, low energy anon

anon from post

>>8623575 (lb)

i know how it feels to now have Rainman bitch about your post not being notabled

it drowns out your post

he doesnt help for shit ever, makes matters worse, and is a total degenerate when it comes to chan sheit on this board

most bakers perhaps dont do much with opines, but i do

when i bake later i will make effort to rehash your opine

>>8623575 (lb)

i liked it, so did others, good analysis anon

>>8623879

you were ID 73ca95

you get filtered pretty much as soon as you ID yourself with your newfags, lurkers oxymoron

>>8623921

you are pathetic

again, perhaps read it slower

if you think its notable but others dont - they are clowns and are hiding info

if you think its not but others do - they are clowns and are pushing disinfo

reconcile this logic

>>8623815

>why did you not even reply to anons?

you mean ID 73ca95?

fuckin idiot cant even reconcile the possibility he gets filtered for glowing as megashill