>US House Justice cmmte
Judicial committee voted against release? Or the House Intel committee?
Need to know so I can make accurate memeage.
Name them shame them
>FISA in the end analysis became a powergrab honeypot for sick and stupid people to use in an attempted coup
Not new but useful at this time - pic related
Vote was strictly party lines. Ds always vote against transparency SEE >>86549
And thanks to all who answered - I was busy looking up the committee member's photos to SHAME THEM
Accuracy is important, and I know you feel the same way. I also saw you go through, painstakingly, and ensure all posts were in EST. The spreadsheet was harmonized and updated because of your enormous effort. I know you are very careful and care a lot, which is why you work so hard.
Those of us here from the beginning, though we are anon, know each other by our tasks, by our work ethic, and by our output.
Record-keepers keep records. Those who do this do it because it is a task that suits them - fastidious, careful, attention to detail.
I also know that whenever you, I or anyone else has been told of an error or oversight, we are careful to check and double check - because we care about the accuracy, and integrity, of the records we are keeping, and we have no problem making corrections, because unlike others - it is not about ego at all, it is about accuracy. It is not a personal matter to us, only the information is important.
With that said -
There is a coordinated effort to attack the foundations of our effort here - Q's posts and the accuracy of our records.
< we can see it for what it is
If they can no longer ignore Q, they can no longer ignore us here, they are having avenues of movement, action and escape dwindling daily, what else can they do? They are left with few options.
The one they have chosen today is to attempt to undermine the confidence in the records we have faithfully kept, undermine confidence in the record-keepers, sow doubt and discord.
They will fail.
They will fail as they always do.
They will become more shrill and more panicked daily.
It only shows their fear and weakness.
Even their best are pitiful.
They grow weaker as we grow stronger.
Hang tight, rawtxtbro, we're in this together to the end.
I have not checked it in a while, but I will personally vouch for rawxtxbro. You cannot imagine the effort he has taken. Anyone can check the txt file against the spreadsheet.
I will say - I doubt included in it are the BO & codemonkey posts that are in the spreadsheet for explanatory purposes so aren't really needed on the rawtxt file of Q's posts (I put them in the spreadsheet because it's read worldwide a lot to explain to people what happened, why changed boards, codemonkey confirm Q auth etc), but rawtxtbro is very careful. I trust him a lot.
If you feel the need to check it against the spreadsheet or the pdf file, go right ahead to ease your mind. That's why we do it - so people can see for themselves! So you can have confidence that you are seeing what Q actually posted, not someone's recollection, not an imposter. You can see it for yourself in multiple formats.
Those records are made for you.
You are very welcome.
Thank you. The rawtxt file, the spreadsheet, the pdf, can all be checked against each other, there are links to the threads and the posts. They are in harmony because they are correct. Those who continually harp and screech about inaccuracies but never produce them are glowing, here to sow trouble and can be disregarded. All of us record-keepers make extraordinary efforts to correct any factual errors, and all have seen that happen, happen quickly and with a good attitude. I will vouch for all 3, and I thank you for taking that into consideration.
Why would they even do that now? They believe Q is fake, so they're just still trying to ride coattails off of this? (rhetorical questions)