Anonymous ID: b0b6b4 March 31, 2020, 2:40 a.m. No.8633310   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3321 >>3506 >>3665

Not to beat a dead horse, but still curious about the Twitter backgrounds that are grey’ed out. For instance, these are still grey’ed out:

Senator Grassley, Trey Gowdy, Devin Nunes, and John Solomon

 

Noticed that it’s true for CodeMonkey as well.

 

Ron…why is your Twitter background Grey?

>Twitter driven? User driven? Third party driven?

 

Do any Anons know how to send this message to Ron directly? He is probably on duty here almost 24/7. BTW: Thanks for all your great work CodeMonkey! Big time shout out!

Anonymous ID: b0b6b4 March 31, 2020, 2:59 a.m. No.8633392   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3665

>>8633321

Probably true by default, right? In other words, some of the reason for the grey is for those folks (often true for myself) who are too lazy or don’t care about making their page all fancied up.

 

So, that may be true for the above mentioned folks specifically. All people who use the social media tool for basic stuff and aren’t tied in to the graphical appeal of a background image.

 

However, that still doesn’t answer for all the others in all the variety of colors that seemed to change within a 12 hour period.

Anonymous ID: b0b6b4 March 31, 2020, 3:27 a.m. No.8633503   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8633361

>>8633380

The reason that it is also quite odd is that something out of place like that is also out of place with what she has focused her personal time and energy on …

Causes and charities for Children

From:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilary_Duff

 

However, her background fits the Hollywood/Disney female child star stereotype that has not really been treated appropriately. It’s also stereotypical as of late to find that those with those challenges tend to turn to children based charitable work.

 

Frankly, these could be images of things she has found troubling as well and is fighting for a good cause well intentioned.

Anonymous ID: b0b6b4 March 31, 2020, 3:59 a.m. No.8633665   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8633559

>>8633538

>>8633559

>>8633310

>>8633392

This was information the started to be posted and collected a couple of days ago. I initially dug and posted the conservative camp champs, but still haven’t heard a plausible reason behind this. Gave my own guesses as well.

Again…

>Twitter driven? User driven? 3rd party driven?

 

What are the conclusions then Anons?

Anonymous ID: b0b6b4 March 31, 2020, 4:12 a.m. No.8633735   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8633176

Normal, normal for us Night Shift diggers.

Can’t sleep?

>qresearch, encourage frustrated Anons, do shout outs to fags of all skills, dig, and meme…repeat…

 

At least you’ll feel like you patriotically slowly moved the needle forward.

 

For the Prepared, Riding out the Storms is Exciting

>Probably true for the ancient of days big flood riders too.