Anonymous ID: 4b64d1 March 31, 2020, 5:20 a.m. No.8633991   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8633947

They better be Surrounded and Scrambling. Kidnappers with Govt/State Clearance.

Talk about Swamp! Kids in cages? This Corona Crap essentially Locked down any ongoing cases from hitting the courts, keeping the children hostage. They have no rules, they follow no laws, they make up their own, and if you try to challenge them, they will cut you out of the Child's life. The people running this shit are EVIL, and the ignorant case workers are complicit.

Anonymous ID: 4b64d1 March 31, 2020, 5:23 a.m. No.8634008   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4013

>>8633950

Interesting indeed. Will China be picking up the tab for the stimulus', like Mexico is paying for the Wall? If not, they (and ALL co-conspirators) should be.

Wasn't there a Q drop about "Class Actions."

Anonymous ID: 4b64d1 March 31, 2020, 6:01 a.m. No.8634305   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Matrix was released on 3.31.1999

 

March 31, 1999 – March 31, 2020

7,671 days

 

Did a mirror search for 1767 and came up with this.

The Townshend Acts were a series of measures, passed by the British Parliament in 1767, that taxed goods imported to the American colonies. But American colonists, who had no representation in Parliament, saw the Acts as an abuse of power. The British sent troops to America to enforce the unpopular new laws, further heightening tensions between Great Britain and the American colonies in the run-up to the American Revolutionary War.

 

The British Crown emerged victorious from the French and Indian War in 1763, but defending the North American colonies from French expansion had proved tremendously costly to England.

 

Compared to Great Britain’s debts, the cost of the French and Indian War to the colonists had been slight. The colonists—who arguably enjoyed a higher standard of living at the time than their British counterparts—paid less than one-twentieth the taxes of British citizens living in England.

 

The British government thought the colonists should help pay the cost of their protection. The British Parliament enacted a series of taxes on the colonies for the purpose of raising revenue. Early attempts, such as the Stamp Act of 1765—which taxed colonists for every piece of paper they used—were met with widespread protests in America.

 

Townshend Duties

The Townshend Acts, named after Charles Townshend, British chancellor of the Exchequer, imposed duties on British china, glass, lead, paint, paper and tea imported to the colonies.

 

Benjamin Franklin had informed the British Parliament that the colonies intended to start manufacturing their own goods rather than paying duties on imports. These particular items were chosen for taxation because Townshend thought they would be difficult things for the colonists to produce on their own. He estimated the duties would raise approximately 40,000 pounds, with most of the revenue coming from tea.

 

While the original intent of the import duties had been to raise revenue, Charles Townshend saw the policies as a way to remodel colonial governments. The Townshend Acts would use the revenue raised by the duties to pay the salaries of colonial governors and judges, ensuring the loyalty of America’s governmental officials to the British Crown. However, these policies prompted colonists to take action by boycotting British goods.

 

Charles Townshend didn’t live to see the measures enacted. He died suddenly in September 1767, before the detrimental effects of his signature rules could materialize.

 

Townshend Act Protests

The Townshend duties went into effect on November 20, 1767, close on the heels of the Declaratory Act of 1766, which stated that British Parliament had the same authority to tax the American colonies as they did in Great Britain. By December, two widely circulated documents had united colonists in favor of a boycott of British goods.

 

Read more https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/townshend-acts

Anonymous ID: 4b64d1 March 31, 2020, 6:23 a.m. No.8634493   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4643

Interesting article. Picture of Floating Jail caught my attention.

 

==COVID-19 Prisoners in NY City Jails Sound Alarm–

 

'I fear for my life': Prisoners in New York City jails sound alarm as coronavirus spreads

 

On the morning of March 15, amid escalating fears about the COVID-19 outbreak, a 62-year-old educational consultant showed up at the John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York for a flight to Trinidad, where he planned to attend a funeral, he said. But police stopped the consultant at the gate and arrested him under a year-old warrant, alleging he’d given bogus information for a state identification card in New Jersey.

 

The arrest led the consultant into New York‘s notoriously brutal and unsanitary jail system, where COVID-19 was beginning to spread.

 

The consultant, who spoke on condition that he be identified only by his first name, Bill, knew jail would be terrible. But he said he was shaken by an apparent lack of protection against the coronavirus for inmates and workers.

 

His first night in the Vernon C. Bain Center, a floating jail in the East River, was spent on a floor, lying back-to-back with other men, “like a slave ship,” he said. Then he was assigned to a dorm at the floating jail where inmates — many of them charged with nonviolent crimes or parole violations — bunked about 3 feet apart, ate at communal tables, shared toilets, showers and phones and had soap but no masks, disinfectant or alcohol wipes to keep their detention space clean, he said. New inmates arrived, others left. Corrections officers guarded them without much protective gear beyond gloves. They tracked news of the virus’ spread on the day-room television.

 

“We were left to our own defenses,” Bill recalled. “We didn’t know what was going to happen to us with the virus. We were in cramped quarters where no one really cared.

 

That sense of being stalked by a deadly disease without being able to defend against it pervades New York City jails, according to inmates, reform advocates, defense lawyers, health officials and the union representing corrections officers. So far, 167 inmates and 114 Department of Correction staff members have tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus, signs that it is being transmitted inside facilities and following those who are infected as they return to outside communities.

 

Too long to post. Read more

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fear-life-prisoners-york-city-223028145.html