>>8638374 (lb)
>>8638512 (lb)
Could "Every dog has its day" not just refer to NoName (Q#1649), but to everyone responsible for 9/11. It's the K9→MIRROR→9/11 thing that's come up at least twice. There's also Q#2522 re: GHWB.
Might help explain those DS dog twats that were going on a while back.
-
-
*
-
In 2004, Popular Mechanics decided to examine 9/11 conspiracy theories, and eventually published the book Debunking 9/11 Myths, which marshaled an impressive team of writers, reporters and experts to make the case that such popular myths could not stand up to the facts.
The late Sen. John McNoName wrote the forward for the book, in which he argued “any explanation for the tragedy of 9/11 must start and end with the facts,” and praised Popular Mechanics for its “old-fashioned approach” of relying on “reporting, evidence and eyewitnesses.”
And yet McNoName lamented, “still the conspiracy theorists peddle their wares.”
“We cannot let these tales go unanswered,” he wrote. “The 9/11 conspiracy movement exploits the public anger and sadness. It shakes Americans’ faith in government at a time when that faith is already at an all-time low.”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/did-the-9-11-attacks-usher-in-the-post-truth-age