>>8639673 Me repost

I called this yesterday. DOJ is working with DOD in joint jurisdiction. POTUS would not answer OANN question about if Maduro was working with Mexican Drug Cartels . POTUS knew the answer. They were all working with our C_A and there time is UP. Ships coming home to protect the Motherland… is if for drugs only?????? Are the 2700 sailors really sick????? Esper was not part of the operation against Maduro yet he answered questions about it. That confirms the dual jurisdiction

repost

10 Days of Darkness = 10 DoD prosecutions when they have concurrent jurisdiction with DOJ

Memorandum of understanding 669 and Q drop 669 would be one of those occasions

POLICY

The Department of Justice has primary responsibility for enforcement of Federal laws in the United States District Courts. The Department of Defense has responsibility for the integrity of its programs, operations and installations and for the discipline of the Armed Forces. Prompt administrative actions and completion of investigations within the two (2) year statute of limitations under the Uniform Code of Military Justice require the Department of Defense to assume an important role in Federal criminal investigations. To encourage joint and coordinated investigative efforts, in appropriate cases where the Department of Justice assumes investigative responsibility for a matter relating to the Department of Defense, it should share information and conduct the inquiry jointly with the interested Department of Defense investigative agency.

It is neither feasible nor desirable to establish inflexible rules regarding the responsibilities of the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice as to each matter over which they may have concurrent interest. Informal arrangements and agreements within the spirit of this MOU are permissible with respect to specific crimes or investigations.

2 listeners are the 2 witnesses.

Here is the Memorandum of understanding and all the concurrent jurisdiction.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-669-prosecution-military-personnel

Lawfag, if you're around, I would appreciate a second set of eyes on this memorandum. Thanks in advance