>>865959

"salacious" lol

>>865975

You nailed the #1 phrase by him

>>865984

would "SEL" count, or would it just be the "e"?

>>865993

LOL yours too

Odds of IG Report this week?

>>866072

It fails all the time. No correlation between pornfag and Q

>>866081

What about the other 979?

>>866078

>>866111

I literally see porn in someway shape or form on this board EVERY single day. There is NO correlation between some dumb anon posting porn and all of a sudden Q appears. Seriously dude. Thats some tin foil hat shit

>>866111

First of all, we have no way of knowing if "pornfag" is one person, the same person, only been posting for a month, etc.

>>866131

I'm half surprised they mentioned Q….thats a bit dangerous, to bring attention to him. We have to assume CNN has known about Q's posts for awhile, but to finally touch the subject is a slippery slope for them. Maybe they are really at the end, and have realized the influence Q has had, and realize that now its time to acknowledge the name publicly, and fight it

>>866151

yeah and any anon that sees it can save it and repost

>>866172

I cant wait for them to label Q a terrorist. LOL but really, cant wait to see if they try and censor anyone from talking about him, or push the conspiracy really bad to try and shame us into silence