>>865055
It looks like the California data for feb was pushed into the march pool. I would really like to understand the baseline data better as well. 1077 refers to the number of criminal cases, not individual filings in these cases. In light of this ambiguity, does anyone have confirmation that the these sealed filing numbers are strictly drawn from criminal courts?
http:// tiny url.com / y97q9w4g links to a google drive with a 2006 study
I don't use twitter so can't contact these researchers, if any anons have more information, lets really understand this. This document is our strongest piece of objective evidence something huge is going on and we need to be 100% it is factually correct and thoroughly understood.