Anonymous ID: 7fe417 April 1, 2020, 10:10 p.m. No.8657989   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8657916

 

you presume to know what q would do, you fucking fool

 

the question is, would q order steinbart to play this public role in the movie?

 

as if q hasn't ordered others to play annoying roles to draw more public attention and

confusion,

 

unlike your ignorant comments, q is NOT predictable, fool

Anonymous ID: 7fe417 April 1, 2020, 10:21 p.m. No.8658095   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8657956

Ive watched every video, and his 4 (so far) livestream interviews with anons, i"ve read his tweets. I've downloaded his amporphous file from 2 yrs ago, have read his many ansers to comments on his YT channel, and today I watched his new livesream interview pt 2 on babyq

 

and what have you watched, 30 seconds of one video maybe? ignorance blissness is not factness fool

Anonymous ID: 7fe417 April 1, 2020, 10:49 p.m. No.8658370   🗄️.is 🔗kun

try looking at it this way, a good movie has to be, above all, ENTERTAINING, otherwise no one will want to watch it, especially young and old leftist dumfucks that have no inclination to learn anything that contradicts their state programmed 'minds'

for the most part, what goes on on this board isn't suitable for public consumption, someone like steinbart is an attempt to reach the other 99.999999% of people that won't spend their lives trying to solve the puzzle like the annons here do

game theory encompasses so much more than most anons here are even aware of, some in the know call it GAMENESS, and steinbart is here to play the game whether ignorant anons like it or not, the ultimate goal is more important than your weak attempts at arguing by ridicule and insults