Anonymous ID: 577060 April 2, 2020, 9:27 a.m. No.8661912   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1990 >>2004 >>2135

pd notable:

https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/caltech-researchers-find-evidence-real-ninth-planet-49523

 

Sitchen kek's last, don't ya know? kek!

 

Can we do Velikovsky next or still too much too soon?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

 

Immanuel Velikovsky (/ˌvɛliˈkɒfski/; Russian: Иммануил Великовский, IPA: [ɪmənʊˈil vʲɪlʲɪˈkofskʲɪj]; 10 June [O.S. 29 May] 1895 – 17 November 1979) was a Russian independent scholar who wrote a number of books reinterpreting the events of ancient history, in particular the US bestseller Worlds in Collision published in 1950.[1] Earlier, he had played a role in the founding of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel, and was a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst. Velikovsky's work is frequently cited as a canonical example of pseudoscience and has been used as an example of the demarcation problem.[2]

 

His books use comparative mythology and ancient literary sources (including the Old Testament) to argue that Earth suffered catastrophic close contacts with other planets (principally Venus and Mars) in ancient history. In positioning Velikovsky among catastrophists including Hans Bellamy, Ignatius Donnelly, and Johann Gottlieb Radlof [de],[3] the British astronomers Victor Clube and Bill Napier noted "… Velikovsky is not so much the first of the new catastrophists …; he is the last in a line of traditional catastrophists going back to mediaeval times and probably earlier."[4] Velikovsky argued that electromagnetic effects play an important role in celestial mechanics. He also proposed a revised chronology for ancient Egypt, Greece, Israel, and other cultures of the ancient Near East. The revised chronology aimed at explaining the so-called "dark age" of the eastern Mediterranean (c. 1100–750 BC) and reconciling biblical history with mainstream archaeology and Egyptian chronology.

 

In general, Velikovsky's theories have been ignored or vigorously rejected by the academic community.[5] Nonetheless, his books often sold well and gained an enthusiastic support in lay circles, often fuelled by claims of unfair treatment for Velikovsky by orthodox academia.[6][7][8][9] The controversy surrounding his work and its reception is often referred to as "the Velikovsky affair"

 

Keep in mind that the Mainstream EVERYTHING thinks that we are a bunch of fucking crazy people following some kid in his mothers basement around whilst also being violent white supremacist'!

 

They want us to believe that Sitchin and Velokovsky are crazy as well….

Crazy wooo pseudo scientific nonsensical conspiracy theories….

Enjoy!

Anonymous ID: 577060 April 2, 2020, 9:40 a.m. No.8662040   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2061 >>2197 >>2332

>>8661983

my fav is asking them to explain how Q posted the following image before it existed anywhere else online… well, go on! :D

 

and once we deal with that little bit of Cog Dis I tell them that we have 100's of proofs like this at which time we have a little talk about mathematical impossibility etc…

 

Predictive programming/conditioning does not require belief.

Contact is all that is required so whether you realize it or not most have been red pilled simply via exposure.

Anonymous ID: 577060 April 2, 2020, 9:48 a.m. No.8662133   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8662004

Correct.

I would love to see all the other tablets interpreted to hear the tale they would tell.

I fear that Cog Dis will prevent this as this is way too deep for the 99%.

Very Disturbing.

 

Try Velikovsky if you have not already. I came to his work via the backdoor>electric universe>expanding earth etc.

 

Neal Adams!

I love coincidences and controversy! kek

Anonymous ID: 577060 April 2, 2020, 9:56 a.m. No.8662219   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2269

>>8662061

this would mean that most of my frenz and fam are tards and while that may be true! kek

I blame more of it on that fluoride stare, dumbing down, poison everything etc etc….

They have like a 5 sec attention span unless pretty colors which is why Joe's video are at least somewhat effective.

Anonymous ID: 577060 April 2, 2020, 10:03 a.m. No.8662306   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2405

>>8662135

see: neal adams

 

Sitchin a fraud? based upon what evidence to contradict his hypothesis?

I do not believe some of his conclusions yet otherwise he took great pains to show his work and be transparent.

 

IMHO The only thing that could stop anyone from seeing him as genuine is preconceived notions of reality and Cog Dis.

 

Velikovsky approach of taking the ancients seriously for once makes complete sense to me.