Polly exposes the COVID hoax at Elmhurst Hospital
In (PB) we see shills freaking the fuck out that people are spreading the news that the Elmhurst story is a hoax. Three noms from anons fight back
>>8668831 (PB), >>8668872 (PB) >>8668999 (PB)
OVER THE TARGET
f7f82b is jidf
Yeah I mean I get it. Just asking can you explain which Q drop the video is from? Remember when you said:
>The bitch wouldn’t even be here if it wasn’t for Q. All she does is siphon info from the drops now fuck off with your faggotry
? You wanna actually explain that?
I'm curious. I'll listen.
Whenever the shills attack without providing coherent rebuttals in English, like an anon, you know you've touched a nerve. They will claim they've "done research" but will never tell you what it is. They will claim "she's a clown" but never explain why.
It's just gaslighting, plain and simple. Anons see through it eventually and find the truth.
I mean look at these clowns >>8669228, >>8669225, >>8669252
Do they provide substance? No. They just whine. Some bakers listen, some don't. Depends on how much of a newfag or clown the baker is.
But they will never argue the point, and never provide a coherent reply.
Just remember clowns, God wins. You better repent.
How are your image names identical?
still no arguments. They just keep repeating the same thing. Do you think they'll ever learn? kek. >>8669318, >>8669325
Hmm I think that is actually true. That's interesting.
>Angels are not male or female in the way that humans understand and experience gender. But whenever angels are mentioned in the Bible, the word translated “angel” is always used in the masculine form. Also, when angels appeared to people in the Bible, they were always seen as men. And when they were given names, the names were always masculine.
I don't think angels can have children, so it would make sense they're all male.
Do you have an argument, or are you just going to call me a shill? Do you want to talk about why people aren't notabling information that proves that the Elmhurst video is fake news?
No? You just want to reeee? Don't worry. I believe you're a real boy.
It's argued about where one side provides evidence and facts, and the other provides… what exactly? What argument did they post besides "I don't like this"?
If shills can convince you what is notable so easily, I stand by my original statement: You're a weird baker.
>Been called worse.
Yes, I'm being nice because I'm an actual human.
No anons refuted it. Just shills reeeing. Not a single substantive argument made. What's the argument against it, baker?
Yes some fight for truth, and some are shills. I know.
What's the argument? Why do people keep avoiding this very easy basic question?