Anonymous ID: b5a768 April 3, 2020, 2 p.m. No.8675426   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5474

>>8675356

 

US Navy War College conducted their viral epidemic simulation in September 2019 and they had 50 professionals participate in the simulation.

 

Urban Outbreak 2019

 

https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/civmilresponse-program-sims-uo-2019/

Anonymous ID: b5a768 April 3, 2020, 2:30 p.m. No.8675743   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8675554

 

Obvious from her statement she does not believe in nor support the US Constitution. The US is a union of states. The election of President was never by popular vote of the people at large. The election is based on an equal voice amongst the states. So why doesn't CA, NY and other large population states reflect the equal vote of the people and divide their Electoral College votes in proprtiion to the wishes of the people?

 

"Slay The Dragon" wiki and imdb summary provide minimal insight. About gerrymandering and each perrson's vote should be equal.

 

IMBD User Reviews:

 

Erects untrue premises

 

Consider this, California, the largest state in the Union, has a 45:7 ratio of Democrat dominance in its US Congressional Representatives. That's 6.4:1 or about 84% elected members of Congress being Democrats. Within the state assembly, Republican voters are also under represented,with assembly members being 60:18. That is a serious under representation of Republican voters when compared to all polling and statewide office election results. ALL California electoral college votes go to Democrat presidential candidates the six Presidential elections. Yet this gigantic and artificially imposed Democrat advantage in election results, over representation of Democrats compared to popular vote received in the state, is not "gerrymandering" by the criteria used by the frankly and obviously partisan and makers of this 'documentary".

 

Oh and in fact several of this "documentary" producers (read funders) are Democrat party contributors. Hmm. This is not a documentary, but a partisan polemic, one that deploys a half dozen major logical fallacies. As far as ranked choice voting, or better yet runoffs, why not mention that the data clearly show that would have resulted in a certainty of a 2016 Trump win as well (given the studies showing that libertarians draw 85% from GOP and Greens draw 83% from Dems, and there were a lot more libertarian votes than greens), and would likely have resulting in Bill Clinton losing.

 

Documentary cherry picks data and effect in one sided way

 

My state polls at about 53% Democrat 42% GOP in the last ten years on average. But 75% of the Representatives, and 100% of the Senators we sent to the US Congress and Senate are Democrats. The anti-gerrymandering proposed in this documentary would result in even more Democrat seats, which is to say even disenfranchisement of GOP voters. Like the other reviewer I have wonder why the documentary makers did not note that ranked choice voting would have given Donald Trump a larger margin of victory, and less GOP seats lost in the 2018 midterms? Actually ranked choice would have mean no president Kennedy and no President Clinton. Why is Georgia's representation unfair but the fact that both senators from Virginia are Democrats when that state cleanly averages 50% to 48%?

 

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10011500/

Anonymous ID: b5a768 April 3, 2020, 2:46 p.m. No.8675904   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8675771

 

Basically the picture's message is the Massachusetts National Guard members will be providing patients of the covid-19 epidemic the same professional medical care and empathy they routinely show patients such as those at the Holyoke Soldiers Home > >

the very best care possible.