dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: 17d3d0 April 3, 2020, 6:53 p.m. No.8679181 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9214

>>8679068 lb

>Most of his miracles were cheap tricks

This is a problematic way to frame things. When these special historical figures accomplish these things, they shouldn't be downplayed. They aren't cheap tricks. Yes, as I explained last night, there are other people who accomplished similar feats, but that doesn't diminish their achievement.

Maybe my problem is that you write it off as being super simple when, in reality, only specifically very powerful historical figures were capable of these things.

Maybe I'm sperging over this, but we have no reason to confuse the normies like this. The way you frame things is too abrasive and you're likely to turn more away than you are to help them attain the proper frame of reference.

Next, The Christ is indeed the Messiah. He came (comes) from Venus to help (it's really a she...) and he keeps coming back because we fucking need the help. (You) will not insult your savior.

Then there's that last bit - insisting Joshua didn't know how to use al-chemy. This is nonsense. He studied with and ultimately taught the ascended masters. This is a foolish assertion.

Anyway, I may be being too hard on you, but I think it's important that we use a more inviting frame with the normies. There's too many of them that just desperate eat up all of the shit from the Pope and their heathen priests.

You have to be more sensitive, anon. They will not come around if you keep doing this copypasta shtick just like they won't come around if you attack them instead of using the Socratic method or working with the foundation they've already developed.

Maybe my biggest issue isn't so much your poor choice of words, but the way you present things.

Granted, I may not be the best to lecture you over this considering my having failed in this regard in the past, but I think I've learned a thing or two that have made what I attempt to do a little more effective.

Yes, I'm also an asshole, but it's my hope that I'm a little more helpful than you're being.

Anonymous ID: 17d3d0 April 3, 2020, 7:01 p.m. No.8679278 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9291

>>8679214

Wait… did you mean to group me in with the other people?

I think one of us is pretty confused. Me and anon were having a conversation about how to best help the normies overcome the Bible programming.

We both sort of felt each other out a bit but it seems we're coming around.

No harm, no foul on my end.

I never "muh joo"'d. Even then, I would always say "Jew" because the ones we largely condemn around these parts aren't simple "Jews". Besides, most "Jews" will just tell you they're Christian.

Also, maybe you didn't know this, but you tagged three different anons there…

I'm leaning much more toward you being the one that's confused.

>>8679203

>Not knowing the battle is already won.

Check out Bill Wood, anon.

>>8679291

Be more specific, then.

Anon and I were having a big boy discussion where we didn't jump directly to character attacks becasue we were too lazy and pubescent to discuss the facts like big boys.

I don't need your approval or anything, but I want to know specifically what you disagree with, as that helps be better deliver the message.

I take it by the image you've posted, you're upset I mentioned "Bible programming".

Are you just going to crack consensus, or are you going to actually contribute a well-thought-out argument that pertains directly to the subject at hand, or are you going to cast stones like an ammo-less child that's way in over his head?

>>8679312

The only way we lose is by failing each other by becoming so demoralized that we can no longer get any work accomplished.

We need each other. We need to tell each other when they're wrong, explain precisely why and do our best to avoid jumping to conclusions about who's a shill or who isn't.

This is one of the biggest changes I've personally noticed over the past couple of years - this is no longer a place of intelligent discussion, but a place for people to sperg instead of calmly explaining faults in each other's messages.

Most here are more likely any more to point fingers, to feed in the name calling slide process rather typically begun by shills (entirely on purpose) than we are to maturely figure out issues, give each other constructive criticism and solve problems plaguing us all.

>>8679376

I'm pretty sure the Sky Event was the destruction of the Venezuelan satellite and subsequent Space Force deployment.

>>8679463

What's the point of bringing this up?

Are you insinuating that he's evil because people depict him in art as making the same hand sign you remember seeing from some inversion magick painting some corrupting faggots made?

What's the logic in bringing this up over and over again? What's your aim?

>>8679520

Many Islamic countries are also a Theocracy.

Our Founding Fathers disagree with you.

In fact, most of them described themselves as Diest, not Christian.

Hell, the vast majority of Americans were what we today would call Pagans. They were intimately obsessed with Astrology, for instance.

What do you expect the Salem Witch Trials were about?

It was the same thing with the Black Plague. They blamed all of the "witches" in the woods (who were also just "Pagan", Escotera-practicing Diests) for not already having saved them, so they killed them all. Boy, that sure makes a lot of sense, doesn't it?

Yet, comically, you think the Wizards and Warlocks are going to save you… all while realizing that they're fucking trying and you just keep writing them off and conflating them with the evil fucks that practice the Occultic Inversion Magick.

The Occult isn't bad. It's neither Good nor Bad. You're just a brainwashed absolutist who's rigidity is hardly admired around here outside of the normie perspective.

You don't even know how any of us got here, but you make naive assertions like this…

I get how abrasive this sounds, but this needs to be said.