>>8680021

Exact dates of operations planned 9-10 months ahead tend to be closely guarded secrets. Nah.

>>8680081

https://twitter.com/USMC/status/1138053196436238336

>>8680105

>"Nothing of importance happened today."

https://newsfeed.time.com/2012/07/04/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-fourth-of-july/slide/much-ado-about-nothing-of-importance/

>>8680144

>are saying is that the magnetic waves are bad

Those are shills, idiots, and delusional people. The power levels are so tiny and the frequencies sooo far away from those our nervous systems operate at (arguably) that there is not even the remotest possibility of 5G having a biological effect.

The issue is surveillance, tracking, privacy, etc.

>>8680447

> it's technically charged particles

>>8680348

>Dry. Hacking. Lasts for weeks.

You should go see a real doctor about that.

>>8680538

We need to find that presentation. It sounds like he's inferring that it's likely that the Trump admin would "be faced with the challenges their predecessors were faced with" based on historical experience.

The vid from Next News Network: