That means someone else has the same IP address as yours. That can possibly happen if either of you is using a VPN. Not likely, but possible.
BTW it's at (1).
That means someone else has the same IP address as yours. That can possibly happen if either of you is using a VPN. Not likely, but possible.
BTW it's at (1).
Oh my! Such syncopation!
I believe what you are seeing overlaid on your TV program is the US military doing a dress rehearsal prior to initiating broadcast operations via all the major stations. I posted this morning on how that could be technically feasible.
>>8685005 PB
>>8684863 PB
>>8684810 PB
The third part of this story is more difficult to gather sauce on. Anon has read someplace (can't find it anymore!) of military capability to tap into, intercept, and modify, digital data streams on the fly โ whether wireless transmissions, satellite, or fiberoptic terrestrial lines.
If they can do this (anon STRONGLY believes it is possible), then all of the ANALOG broadcast facilities described in >>8684863 PB, >>8684810 PB could also be used to inject digital signals into the data stream.
What is the digital architecture for broadcast television stations? Local stations receive receive high bandwidth digital data from a headquarters central location that produces the national programming, and retransmit it on local cable and over-the-air broadcast frequencies. In addition, local stations insert their own locally-produced programs into specific time slots, and these are also transmitted over wirelines or wirelessly from the production studio to the transmitter site.
To replace standard broadcast stations with modified transmissions would only require overriding and injecting something different into those digital distribution channels.
I strongly believe that this capability exists, and we may even see it exercised very soon in America.
The purpose of this set of posts is simply to demonstrate that it's FEASIBLE, not to speculate whether or not it will be used.
Anons who have re_read Q's crumbs already know that we are in a movie and that some type of video incriminating the Deep State is expected to be released to the public. I'm not here to argue that point, only to illustrate what is possible and what might be expected from a technical standpoint.
We ALREADY have our top military logistics general in charge of CV logistics. He was introduced to the press yesterday and gave a report and answered questions.
There are at least 150 survival (tutorial) graphics that an anon posted, that are in Memes54 tagged survival. Everything from gardening to purifying water to sleeping in the woods to herbs to tying knots etc. etc. etc.
That's an interesting thought. Are the tunnels sealed and air pressure kept at ambient seal level, or is external air simply pumped in? If the latter then yes the air pressure 10 km deep would be much more. Also, deep mines are too hot and need cooling so the miners can work a mile deep. Are the tunnels a complete closed environment with environmental controls?
Anyway โ if someone was brought up from much heavier air pressure they could get the bends like a diver who ascends too quick! What they would need is a high pressure chamber to gradually reduce the air pressure to ambient, not a respirator with intubation.
I'm not sure where to take this line of speculationโฆ
>>8688444 โ doubtrips.
Every day when
>Dr. Birx
steps up to the mic she begins by praising and thanking the modellers.
Truth.