Anonymous ID: e6f377 April 4, 2020, 5:19 p.m. No.8688411   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8533

Good evening, Anons

Ascend to view the battlespace

 

Who profits if China is perceived to be the originator of a bioweapon attack against the world?

If you accept the premise that CoviD-19 is a biological weapon, the originator is clearly the PRC and its attack concerns not only the United States, but the world at large. Who profits? Clearly, not the PRC.

 

Who profits if CoviD-19 successfully results in closure of economies for long periods of time, resulting in mass deprivation of freedom for world populations?

If you accept the premise that this virus must be defeated by means of isolation and vaccination, who is placed in a position to make certain this occurs? How will those in charge of such measures ensure compliance?

 

>Binary solution set

World populace is, by past propaganda, inherently inclined to extract retribution for attack. See both World Wars and other events. However, in the current circumstances, the CinC has indicated that the Wuhan Virus IS, in fact, a biological attack, but no military response has been made to this attack.

Why? Why not?

And POTUS has additionally offered, early on, a vector of medical counterattack to the virus which, until now, has not garnered respect or support from the relevant medical community. The concept of mass vaccination – for a virus - continues to be placed forth as a solution to what appears to be a contrived pandemic.

 

>In either extreme situation mentioned above, qui bono absent enlightened leadership? Who benefits?

 

Neither the ‘’people’’ of China nor the medical community in charge of responding to this crisis will be the ultimate beneficiaries of control or reduction of the populace at large

 

Qui bono?

 

Autists will grasp that the vectors of counterattack lie NOT in the opposition to the direct assaults of CoviD-19 and vaccination. While valid, those conditions are symptomatic of the overall assault.

 

Is another force in play? How will the world come to accept such realities? Revenge is a universally instinctive response. How can China NOT be held to account for this virus?

 

What if the people of China are not responsible? What if a global consortium is responsible?

What if the universal response is to properly medicate, not abdicate privacy and freedom in a vaccine regime?

 

Before the world can properly react to such attacks, IT MUST KNOW THE TRUTH.

 

AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YE FREE

 

A part of the future lies here. Thread the needle. Memetics will be a key component.

The timeline proceeding in reverse? Past proved by future. The second hand unwinds.

 

>Can autists identify the schwerpunkt to attack?

 

Wolf out.