Anonymous ID: bc9ad0 April 2, 2018, 10:08 a.m. No.869346   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9394 >>9407

>>869179

 

Sorry for the wrong terminology, kind sir.

 

So, what can you tell me about the "Q IS RIGHT" thread? Seems legit (to me). Doesn't appear to be divide and conquer (to me). My gut (for what it's worth) tells me that the thread is attempting to bring the backstory into the picture for us to digest and discuss.

 

What say you, kind sir?

Anonymous ID: bc9ad0 April 2, 2018, 10:31 a.m. No.869558   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9594

>>869407

I don't follow. I'm not pushing, at least not intentionally, an old thread. Q IS RIGHT appears to be a new thread. Perhaps I'm wrong there. The first post on it was only a few days ago. And it appeared on bread 1071 (I hope I have that terminology correct) of this thread just last night.

 

My apologies for not quite understanding the lay of the land here (only been here since December), and I appreciate your generous suggestions!

Anonymous ID: bc9ad0 April 2, 2018, 10:33 a.m. No.869570   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>869407

Btw, the "First Tablet of Moses" pdf is deep in object oriented programming. Being used in a religious context, but quite interesting. I've been out of the [programming] business for 15 years, so I'm sure much has changed.

Anonymous ID: bc9ad0 April 2, 2018, 10:42 a.m. No.869643   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>869594

Yes, I see a lot of empty threads in the catalog, and understand your point. I would've never noticed this one except it showed up in bread 1071 of this thread. I'll follow it quietly, and only make a stir if something happens there.

Thanks for your help.