Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 8:20 p.m. No.8690202   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0220 >>0249 >>0263 >>0399

>>8690163

meh i'm throwing my hat in to the they're being faggots ring

even if they're genuine anons who are just too stupid and new to not understand namefagging, these dudes fucking litter the bread, every bread, with loads of unnecessary bullshit that just feels like sliding.

then, even if that's wrong, you guys are hilariously impotent with your presentation. you make yourselves look like some stupid clique and gang up on people when they tell you how retarded you're being.

and on top of all of that, you guys post shit that's WAAAAYYYYYY over any normie's head, which just makes you all look incompetent.

 

i'm guessing your'e either night lights or you're just very stupid discord trannies.

your foolish consensus cracking, forum sliding and gang stalking is way too evident and amateurish and if you retards really suspect we don't notice, you're all kidding yourselves massively.

Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 8:30 p.m. No.8690288   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0303

>>8690242

this is like when SJWs shut out any opposing thoughts and can't come up with anything sensible to counter with, so they just keep poinging out what people are doing, completely reliant on nerolinguistics and groupthink to do all of the explaining for them.

 

if all you're going to do is say "look. these guys are complaining. isn't that terrible?!" people that aren't soft to the emotional persuasion and the sophomoric anchoring are just going to stare at you like a retard, confused about what your retarded aim might be.

 

why can't we talk about the faggots that give each other names that always bake?

why is it such a big deal to bring up how something looks wrong?

is this Reddit? are you just going to explain any dissent against the consensus away as "things I don't like so you shouldn't too"?

 

this isn't Reddit. your shaming techniques are desperately tired here.

none of us have any admiration for this perpetually malignant idiocy.

Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 8:36 p.m. No.8690357   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0479

>>8690266

i'm simply adding to the conversation because it's been seriously egregious as of late. this team of namefags is attempting, desperately, to subvert and demoralize the board

i think what's unfolding tonight is clear evidence to what I'm bringing up.

 

>>8690267

first time i've ever complained about this, lad.

there's been plenty of awesome bakers, but these guys are the ones that have formed some stupid little clique and have abandoned anonymity.

that's as fake and gay as it comes.

Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 8:45 p.m. No.8690456   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0469 >>0498

I don't care about notables or what bakers do when they have the kitchen.

I do care, however, about when "Anons" infiltrate, divide and demoralize all on purpose.

 

These faggots have been working their way in for a while. They undoubtedly use discord hence pic related.

Remember, we're all supposed to be anonymous so that this medium for intellectual exchange doesn't fall away to faggots that want to ensure none of us trust each other enough to get anything done.

The faggots are being super obvious tonight and they're hopping IPs like crazy to craft consensus about people that are willing to voice their annoyance with their incessant infiltration.

Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 8:55 p.m. No.8690571   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0583

Shills expend the most ammunition against the biggest threats. This is simple game theory.

Why waste ammunition against something that doesn't threaten you?

 

Often times, the most resistance deployed unveils the biggest priority.

Why, then, is there so much consensus cracking being employed against people suggesting the "baker's union" is full of faggots that are posing as anons?

 

What happened to the cool graphic baker?

What happened to the bakers that didn't namefag?

What happened to the bakers that didn't crack consensus and gang up on people?

What happened to anons just baking, not filling the bread with endless and needless "tyb" and libido dominandi NLP?

 

Consensus has nothing to do with veracity. Abandon independent reason at your own peril, lest you become an NPC like they fervently desire.

Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 9:03 p.m. No.8690644   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8690584

Well, the Law of One is pretty interesting, but I can tell you, instead, that the Pyramids were power systems that were used to consolidate deposits of solid Light (metalsโ€ฆ like Gold and Silver)

There's a good reason the only real money that exists is precious metals and for a very long time that was widely understood.

 

We were brought here to mine these deposits.

But, "why couldn't they just automate the process" you ask.

The answer is simple: Loosh.

Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 9:07 p.m. No.8690678   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8690651

there are specific genetic mutations that occurred for very good reason that explain this phenomenon

are natural springs more or less likely to be contaminated with metals?

are there many underground pools or lakes?

where are they most likely to exist?

Anonymous ID: aca635 April 4, 2020, 9:09 p.m. No.8690697   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0763

>>8690680

bartender baker?

yeah, that guy was cool and good with photoshop

i wish those guys would come around still

at the very least, we can all make an example out of the namefags to help us socialize normies and newfags a little better