>>8695628
>>8695628
>Why are you shilling so hard on this topic?
because it is bullshit lies. Do you have a wireless router? What are the frequencies used by your wireless router at home? pretty much exactly the same technology as commercial 5G? It is only missing the directional signal (less EM-pollution) and the signal matrix (no difference in EM-pollution). Meaning your router is FAR more polluting than 5G technology. How many of patients deceases can we show is related to wireless routers at home? None? No correlation at all? Wow.. Im convinced that 5G is a real real problem here. So convinced... sigh
>>8695667
Ye I saw that too, irony!