if there's one thing consistent about this board, it's that–whenever the bread no's off–some shill will claim "shill baker."
ty for demonstrating that yet again.
TYB
how old are you, anon? 15?
well, you're here aren't you?
Yes, bred numbering is important
but it's one a zillion fussy details to which bakers must attend
Not gonna list the rest
Bred no will be fixed later
and bread scrapers know this too–or should. If they have to change it by hand, they have to change it. Just like we do. any system that depends on 100% human perfection isn't very good (espec when the person making the error hasn't the ability to fix it).
When it comes to bred numbers, VERY few of the mistakes are from shills. Shills tend to do other things–like walk off breads wo/ notice or posting notables (happened last night in fact–a favorite tactic). Shills also put in really bad notables and then refuse to take them out–happened night before last.
So yes–we have shill problems. But usually they're not so obvious. They are the kind that bakers notice and track. Just as we monitor when shills tend to bake and look for signs that it's a shill baking–one of which is NOT 'name-fagging' or being frenly with other bakers. Ironically, it's the bakers who don't say hello to other bakers, don't have named pastebins, icons or nicknames don't communicate with anons, and don't respond to anon queries who are most likely to be shills (known shill queires don't count).
Does Cartoon Network get a spot, then?
well that's not to say that some bakers are less frenly than others
this is a chan, after all
but most of the regular bakers get along pretty well
when someone shows up and barely says two words, i'm cautious
are they just reserved or distant for a reason?
am a scientist, understand peer review.
also understand complete BS and the mindset of a scientific bureaucrat.
clinical trials not perfect either, most studies fail to look at interaction effects propertly
Also, scientific studies rely upon the idea that each condition is independent– an idea now disproven by quantum physics. So their insistence upon historical formalities like double blind studies with many replications only shows their growing insecurity when it comes to really believing that science is the final arbiter of truth
They are losing ground every day.
i've thought a lot about the boeing situation, espec boeig vs airbus–big time rivalry. instinctively never like airbus, reminds me too much of microsoft, with their people-aren't-as-smart-as-machines philosophy. but there's a lot we don't know, hope it all comes out.
thx for that billboard, stolen. i never saw it but but fren remembers it from when he was 10 - right after the aerospace industry shut down and before microsoft existed.
>clowntards need to be "special"
you means as opposed to shills? I'd say that only the really blended shills have no need to be special. and there aren't that many.
'tis glorious!