>>8701101

Some link the Pearl harbor attack to a US oil embargo on Japan. Bringing that up because of oil pricing oddities occurring now. Have to add Venezuela into that mix in real time, too.

So, going out on a limb, inevitable, unavoidable attack coming. US wide lock down is meant to reduce number of casualties?

US interdiction ( or US leading a WW interdiction) of black hat drug, weapon. oil and human trafficking funding has reached the stage, where, like japan in 1941, decided to attack rather than submit to demands?

>>8701299

OK, some people don't like Steinbart, but whatev.

Steinbart said a few weeks ago that the Queen of Denmark (part of what he calls the European Death Racket) needs to give up Greenland by April 5 or we're going to fuck up some of her shit. Now Queen goes on TV on April 5, or only the 4th time in 60 or 70 years.

If, as you say, Queen of England, who is the point person of the European racket, according to Steinbart, is saying no deal, then shit should start to go down. Not saying Steinbart is gospel; don't care, actually, but the April 5 date is the fucking April 5 date, like it or not, and this is pretty fucking spoopy, if you ask me.

I'm not in CONUS, so I'm not sure if PC yesterday, and/or Surgeon General's Pearl Harbor remarks, were before or after Queen's TV appearance. So, basic question I have is did POTUS hold off on the PC to wait for Queen's message? That would be an important data point in all this.

>>8701770

Looking now like it could it could be interpreted as. "(If we told 100% of… ) the truth (it) would put 99% of the people in the hospital".

Referring back to the 20% - 40% of information being disclosed to the public discussions, it may fit.

IOW, there will be casualties, regardless, the job is to keep them as low as possible, and that is the best alternative; doing nothing will be worse.