Anonymous ID: af6bd3 April 6, 2020, 7:56 p.m. No.8709872   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9926 >>9964 >>9999

>>8709714

>>8709728

It's Apu.

Know your meme.

For some strange reasons neue /qresearch/ is fond of little retarded Apu as opposed to smug Pepe. Not a judgement, just an observation… at least know to which you refer.

More importantly, a chick who also likes bacon is a chick who is not a jewess or arab.

Bacon = jew/arab repellant

Anonymous ID: af6bd3 April 6, 2020, 8:42 p.m. No.8710347   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0439

>>8710057

>>8710078

The two concepts tie together (Gates' statement & the article). Read the article and think about it. The use of various frequencies can affect the human mind and the mind has no way of blocking that (firewall). It is a very important article for those here.

Flippant dismissal is ill advised as anons need this information to conserve original thoughts and autonomy.

Anonymous ID: af6bd3 April 6, 2020, 8:51 p.m. No.8710425   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>8710156

Unfortunately, there are legions who want to 'fix' our brains to make the thought patterns 'acceptable.' The article linked >>8710009 gives an overview of that and the pitfalls (read the footnotes to learn existing -in 1998 declassified capabilities) and ethics involved.

To our opponents (enemies), we, anons, are 'problematic' to be fixed.

>>8710323

>so others won't get access to your system (mind).

If you had read the article, you would know there is nothing voluntary about it. That was the point of the US Army War College linked article - the human mind does not have any natural defenses against outside manipulation via various frequencies (entrainment).

Q actually pointed this in the citation of Cooper's snippet ( shooters + certain Rx drugs + therapists + mobile phones, i.e., carrier waves).

 

Discernment and wisdom do not apply to an involuntary bombardment of certain frequencies via carrier waves.

The Mind Has No Firewall.