>>8573290 ————————————–——– [infiltration instead of invasion] (Cap: UK bread >>8573366 )
This is why I think this was posted in the UK bread:
2) Background: In 1776 we thought we won the war for independence…turns out we won the battle, but the war went covert. If you want to control/rule a country, you need to control their: media, banking, Intel communities, majority of politicians,judges and Military. The US still had enough patriots in the Military and govt to devise and implement the plan. But the US wasn't the first country the British Monarchy tried to rule covertly….the first I believe was Britain itself, and they were successful. I'm no historyfag, but believe they gave the illusion of self governance to the peasants in 1689 with the Constitutional Monarchy…role of the monarchy is "primarily ceremonial." The peasants get to vote, but the monarchy controls all the levers of governance behind the curtain. I think most of the bloodlines were starting to see the writing on the wall….remember, remember the 5th of November (1605). I bet Louis XVI wished he would have taken this approach. Look who now leads the govts in Canada, France and Germany…would they have naturally risen to lead? And Britanons were still able to pass Brexit…impressive.