Anonymous ID: c2a7ff April 6, 2020, 9:23 p.m. No.8710698   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0716

>>8710689

they're terrified bernie will win by a huge margin, after all of biden's recent gaffes. a bernie surge now in the middle of a crisis would invalidate months of them trying to force biden down people's throats.. they're panicking.

Anonymous ID: c2a7ff April 6, 2020, 9:27 p.m. No.8710736   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0758 >>0984

>>8710587

yea this is the most ridiculous thing i've ever read. this is not about the baker. this is about providing a place for Q to post. we are all equal here and all anonymous. no one is above criticism or scrutiny. giving people too many chances encourages low standards and bad behavior. baking isn't for pussies. bakers used to be respected because they were badasses, not because they were self-sacrificing nurses we're supposed to coddle. grow some fucking balls.

 

>>8710699

this

Anonymous ID: c2a7ff April 6, 2020, 9:40 p.m. No.8710833   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0845 >>0850 >>0864 >>0915

>>8710782

no memefags will make memes because that's what they do best. and baking should be what bakers do best. not everyone is going to be a good baker. clearly if you suck at it and have no intention of improving, you should move over and let someone else bake. e-bakes are better than a shitty baker repeatedly bringing down the standards of this place.

 

when you teach them to bake, do you just go over the mechanics of it or do you actually talk about how to bake well and emphasize things such as consistency with the same formatting/systems we've used for almost 3 years every day 24/7?

Anonymous ID: c2a7ff April 6, 2020, 9:45 p.m. No.8710862   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0889

>>8710844

it's especially annoying to see bakers who are not nitpicky, unbothered by fuckups, new to the board, and have teenage levels of discernment when it comes to choosing notables and recognizing who's a shill and who's an anon.

 

>>8710845

i don't make memes. i bake. not as regularly as i used to but i'm allowed to have an opinion on baking and share it with others.

Anonymous ID: c2a7ff April 6, 2020, 9:56 p.m. No.8710934   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1027

>>8710915

no one said we should get rid of bakers entirely. obviously we need themโ€ฆ that was your entire argument..

 

and the difference between now and 2 years ago is that back then anons would hold bakers accountable. so they were in "baking school" every time they baked. anons knew what a good bake looked like and would call out any and all mistakes. and the baker would learn and other bakers would chime in and help out. they would also learn from watching other bakers and practicing enough in comms to do a good job before they even attempted to bake for realโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: c2a7ff April 6, 2020, 10:13 p.m. No.8711033   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1097 >>1119

>>8711016

are you kidding me? plenty of breads were baked per day. it's about the same as it's always been. always faster when Q posts but it just about levels out. this thing has been going at a consistent rate for 3 years. quality has decreased because the quality of the anons here as well as the bakers has significantly decreased since Q went mainstream.

Anonymous ID: c2a7ff April 6, 2020, 10:29 p.m. No.8711146   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1197

>>8711097

it only looks that way because we have more to dig on - there's a ton of news every day and lots of separate pieces of sometimes conflicting new information to connect. because the storm is almost here. i've seen a lot of truly ridiculous "theories" "proofs" and clockfaggery that used to be laughed at.

 

>>8711041 this.

>>8711102 and this. turning this fucking place into PC hell. don't be mean to each other! heaven forbid