Anonymous ID: 01e335 April 6, 2020, 11:47 p.m. No.8711535   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1585

>>8711480

Do you even logic, bro?

Compare: "Donald Trump is in control of the US government, so he's not a naive victim."

Well, Trump is not naive, but he is a "victim" of calumny and slander.

If EVERYONE who attains a position of power MUST be corrupt, then Q is OBVIOUSLY A FRAUD.

But ANONS KNOW that that is not the case.

Pell might be guilty, but that is hardly proven, and facts seem to point to him being a "sacrifice" to protect those actually guilty. (He discovered billions of Euros "missing" at the Vatican…)

The normal pattern for sexual abusers in the Catholic hierarchy is that it is an "open secret" what they were doing. This guy was convicted by ONE accuser, despite other witnesses objecting to the basic factual claims the accuser made.

Compare Cardinal McCarrick of DC. MANY knew that he was manipulating younger men who were priesthood candidates into sexual situations. And many covered for him. And even when it comes to normal priests, the normal situation seems to be that many knew that they were getting "handsy" with youngsters or even engaging in more overt forcible sexual contact. But this guy, described by Q as 3rd in the hierarchy, who had evidence of wrongdoing, goes down by ONE accuser when there are opposing witnesses?

The whole thing is extremely dubious, and anons should try to look at the evidence.