Found on twatter. Legit?

 

Read pinned twat by BusyalltheTime @Jay_B83

 

(If you wanna click dat shit nigga)

https://twitter.com/Jay_B83/status/1247362978850242560?s=20

 

Basically, you use a hash encode-decode website, which links Q posts to specific HRC emails (am I understanding this correctly?).

 

Quotes from the first few posts of the thread:

 

"THIS IS HUGE ANONS CHECK IT OUT FOR YOURSELVES

We have much much more than we know! Q stringers and posts and wikileaks emails connection

 

An Anon says

I think I stumbled upon something huge that was right under our noses

So a couple of breads ago, an anon posted the following:"

 

"which contained a code posted on the twitter page handled by the Assange legal team, and its corresponding Md5 hash.

 

also he posted this hash encode-decode website:"

 

"so I ran a hash encode on the stringer that he posted:

 

>v8(E;K|=4_7<`yc$

 

and search the resulting hash code in the HRC email dump.

 

This led me to the following email (attached).

 

So i decided to give it a shot with some q stringers, and low and behold, it works!"

 

"Not only do the stringers when hashed using that website, give a hash that corresponds to wikileaks emails, but some different stringers, connect to the exact same emails.

 

The chance of this happening "coincidentally" is negligent, and such thing occur only deliberately."

 

"example:

 

Q post #3125 contains the line:

"THE CLINTON FOUNDATION" +++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

if we take the '+++++++++++++++++++++++++' and hash it, we get:

 

72cb258fb64369dd3e9196e6d20c80c6

 

plugging it to the email search by ID gives us:"

 

 

It goes on and on! Really interdasting read.

 

Notable?