The question is "are the email relevant to the posts", and how come we end up with the same bunch of about 7 emails.
P.s.
This theory was discovered by me in ythe nightshift, and i wasnt sliding or shilling.
It probably came from 8kun to twitter.
It is legit. See:
What are the odds that all those weird symbols will hash to the same 5 emails?
Not saying it is a 100% true lead, but it is worth checking, given the fact that yesterday the anon gave a stringer the was hashed to a relevant email (hrc - cdc - global health initiative connection)
Thanks for the input.
And yet, i would assume that for 30 stringers, i will receive hashes that lead me to at least 25-20 different emails. The thing is, that it led me to 5-6 repeatedly, and they were connected to the topics of the posts in most cases.
this is statistically improbable
Also, that anon who posted the hash that led to the cdc-hrc email, did it via this hashing algorithm.
The thing is that this hashing algorithm (md5) is a pretty old and not that secure algortihm from the 1990s. I dont think it is that big of a problem to generate strings that end up leading to the same emails (given that the first few numbers indicate the email number), but what is not probable is the fact that 30 stringer lead only to 5-7 distinct emails. This must be intentional imo.