Anonymous ID: 23a6af April 7, 2020, 7:40 a.m. No.8713212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3228

>>8713005

All of Q's posts are listed in like 5 different types of archives, most of them not scrapers. Also all threads that Q has posted in are archived separately from scraper sites.

Therefore all of Q's posts can be cross-referenced across multiple independent platforms outside of the scraper sites.

(YOU) FAIL

Anonymous ID: 23a6af April 7, 2020, 7:53 a.m. No.8713274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3320

>>8713228

>None tripcoded posts on the boeards,

Would you like to try that again?

There are obviously tripcode posts on the boards, scraper sites, raw text, pdf and spreadsheet.

Anonymous ID: 23a6af April 7, 2020, 8:43 a.m. No.8713545   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8713457

This is a discussion that has been had here in the last 2 weeks. After Q got his first tripcode, he posted a revised, "official" graphic compilation of his actual posts on 4/pol/ (pre-tripcode). That is how we know which early posts were actually Q, and all archives are based on that. You can see the post and the graphic Q posted for yourself.

While scrapers don't include posts Q made without tripcode (mistake or mistaken tripcode pass), they are logged on the spreadsheet IF Q makes a subsequent or duplicate post in that thread with the same ID and the tripcode.

So there really are no apocryphs, as all is accounted for in multiple locations.

Anonymous ID: 23a6af April 7, 2020, 8:45 a.m. No.8713562   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8713442

I think you mistagged my post, anon. Nothing to do with your reply.

>>8713511

No archivist is going to log spoopy pseudo-Q posts as Q posts. I'm not sure how to make it anymore simple for you.