Anonymous ID: c7f0bc April 7, 2020, 6:51 p.m. No.8718291   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8331 >>8402

>>8718250 pb

>re stringers in notables

TBH, I as a baker don't really have the background to eval stringers. Try to get insights on autistic posts from knowledgeable anons. This kind of thing never easy to decide on. But has FUKKEN NOTHING to do with subverting the board or any crap like that. Don't even start.

Anonymous ID: c7f0bc April 7, 2020, 6:55 p.m. No.8718337   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8368 >>8626

>>8718299

not notable

ok by me, she said it on the presser–and it's been said before and notabled if i recall. I know i nommed it previously, bc it was in an article. I just recorded it in the moment so anons would know. Might be able to find it in qresear.ch, lemme see…..

Anonymous ID: c7f0bc April 7, 2020, 6:58 p.m. No.8718368   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8406 >>8598 >>8613

>>8718299

>>8718337

Ok, here's a coupla pcs pointing to the problem--which is that the cause of death for anyone who has covid-19 is listed as covid-19 (when it may actually just be incidental in many cases). They aren't bothering to try to separate those cases.

 

>>8718337

#8703876 at 2020-04-06 18:58:16 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #11144: Suicide, I mean 'Covid Death' Week Edition

 

>>8703807

>Because they are being recorded as covid-19 deaths.

 

Yup

 

#8703807 at 2020-04-06 18:47:52 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #11144: Suicide, I mean 'Covid Death' Week Edition

 

>>8703765

>Pneumonia deaths are the lowest in years.

 

Because they are being recorded as covid-19 deaths.

Anonymous ID: c7f0bc April 7, 2020, 7:01 p.m. No.8718406   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8598

Here's another qresear.ch post alluding to the problem of listing covid-19 as the primary cause of death when it may only be a contributor.

 

>>8718368

#8712657 at 2020-04-07 14:23:08 (UTC+1)

Q Research General #11155: Sorry Hillary It DOES Make A Difference Edition

 

found this on the dutch version of this thread.

translation:

 

covid-19

cause of death

  • or -

straw that broke the camel's back?

 

[table of data showing that of 1876 that died, only 96 died of ONLY corona]

Anonymous ID: c7f0bc April 7, 2020, 7:16 p.m. No.8718598   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8626 >>8918 >>8990

>>8718299

>>8718368

>>8718406

Here it is.

 

Certifying deaths due to COVID–19

 

…If COVID–19 played a role in the death, this condition should be specified on the death certificate. In many cases, it is likely that it will be the UCOD, as it can lead to various lifethreatening conditions, such as pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In these cases, COVID–19 should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I with the other conditions to which it gave rise listed on the lines above it…..

 

In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.”

 

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

 

This is what Deborah Birx admitted with at the presser today

This policy can obviously inflate the number of deaths due to Covid-19.

Anonymous ID: c7f0bc April 7, 2020, 7:25 p.m. No.8718710   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8786

>>8718543

Anon, it goes against the grain for bakers to remove another bakers's notables. It is rarely asked for–or done. If anons have objections, they should be raised during the bread, not after.