There is a lot to learn, anon.
Old society used to see gods as higher beings of diverse capabilities and general higher wisdom. The beings called gods were not necessarily seen as being the be-all of creation, existence, etc. They were understood to simply be the chief forces at play in our world.
God as an absolute entity responsible for all creation and all existence was a very different concept, often identified as a completely separate force or entity from the gods people recognized. The cosmic force of creation that ruled over even the fates of the gods was seen as being the absolute limit of comprehension - only able to grasp fleeting moments of insipration from it before it was gone.
It was later when kings and instittuions began to consolidate the tales of the gods into one rightful God and they as their descendant, fit to rule over humanity.
And that is where you would be incorrect, anon. Q must communicate with you in terms you can understand. There is a difference.
Have you ever considered the possible other definitions behind "God wins?"
The more you know, the more nuanced Q's statements become. Most people are good. Most people believe in a God that is greater than anything religion has ever provided for them.
Evil is as evil does, anon.
That's the pesky thing about that whole fruit of knowledge. We are equipped to judge good and evil.
Now, the argument could be made that most of humanity is descended from Lilith, rather that Adam/Eve, and therefore isn't 'tainted' by knowledge of good and evil…
But that also gets into stories that have been kept mostly inside specific families and aren't as available to the general public, spare for a few humorous works. But… then we have to explain Cain, Set(h), and why "god" is evil… and that gets into stuff no one really has a straight story on.
Suffice it to say that most people are capable of discerning between good and evil when operating on the same information/context.