>>8726040

>>8726057

>>8726083

>>8726092

>>8726096

Something isn't clicking…we know there is a cabal. We know from Q's last post (and from comments made by congressmen) that they are interested in UN intervention; the first incident was during the migrant flooding - there were threats of calling in the UN - (I believe it was AOC)?

What doesn't click is the fact that if WE know that Trump has the full force of the military behind him, that would imply that [they] know it as well. There is no way that anyone on [that] side would wager against the US military.

Was the plan to incapacitate the entire country then infiltrate with UN troops?

>>8726314

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/cannibalism

Cannibalism is the consumption of another human's body matter, whether consensual or not. In the United States, there are no laws against cannibalism per se, but most, if not all, states have enacted laws that indirectly make it impossible to legally obtain and consume the body matter. Murder, for instance, is a likely criminal charge, regardless of any consent. Further, even if someone consents to being eaten and kills himself, the cannibal may still be liable for criminal or civil actions based on laws governing the abuse or desecration of a corpse, which vary from state to state.