lb
you nailed it… the problem with literalists of the bible is that they desire to pigeon hole God into something they can control. Literalists are normally control freaks… just look at the dutch reform movement
lb
you nailed it… the problem with literalists of the bible is that they desire to pigeon hole God into something they can control. Literalists are normally control freaks… just look at the dutch reform movement
lol… always easy to spot a shill…
i was eating some candy today.
I felt sick to my stomach.
Turns out it wasn't candy, it was my mothers birth control.
Now I have tits.
I respect your post and thank you for it. I have been in and out of conspiracy circles for roughly 10 years. I have been following Q for about two and a half. I am not hugely knowledgeable about everything going on. I have a certain segment I stick to while getting little bits of info where I can. I come here mostly because I know I do not get the truth from the MSM. So does that make me a real Anon… probably not by your terms but that is ok.
That being said drops 3909 and 3915 in my opinion are excellent. I never saw anyone on the board wrap up the current situation, like Q did in those two QDrops.
As for the corona situation… what are you talking about. Q predicted that when he/she was doing drops about knocking out satellites with the name Corona.
As for us not being safe… you realize the the numbers are being fudged right? Anyone who is close to dying who gets pushed along faster due to the corona virus gets listed as dying only because of the corona virus. Not to mention the numbers of people dying due to the virus are not exactly that high right in comparison with the flu.
You also realize that President Trump already has the cure to this disease in hand and is trying to get it to us.
This all tells me everything has been planed for well in advance. Not to mention that the drops do not work linearly. Project looking glass.
So I am not sure what you are trying to prove with your post. I agree with you that drop 3917 looks shady… but Q could be pointing to something. Not trying to prove something.