>>8730619

methinks you too harsh anon

MI has incredible people and their academic excellence is under rated

NO WAY average people on this board (who i believe are above average) can compete with that NOR does Q team expect that

(news unlocks)

so dont get your panties in a wad and be so judgemental

we all trying our best and mean well (not shills) and there is plenty on the line

>>8730648

>why in the hell would you ever choose to "have hope" when you can be certain?

some anons are more cerebral and academic

they require more concrete proofs and less faith

some are the opposite

WTF is wrong with all these nasty judgemental posts?

shills? hard to say anons can be OCD

>>8730693

>step the game up.

by your standards?

your ideas?

you forget where you be anon