The fight against the Cabal is a fight on many fronts, fronts in many dimensions.
The Clown Theocratic Regime currently running the show in Iran (Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was
a C_A asset from at least 1963, one Anon dug up, some breads ago now) is one of those fronts, but
discussions here on QResearch General about Iran, and news of it, seems to focus on the strictly
military dimensions of the matter โ proxy armies in Lebanon, blah, blah, blah. Whatever. Some of it
is even good stuff.
What I want to get to is this: "we" (Q+, the Anons, any and all of the White Hats) need to examine
the other dimensions.
It occurred to me, doing digging I will not share here, now (maybe never) that the best way to overthrow
a hostile Theocracy, whose "legitimacy" is grounded (or claimed to be grounded) in capital-R Religion,
is not to attack its armies, but to attack its Religion. Attack. "Attack": what does that mean? Burn its
Holy Places? Shoot its Priests/Ministers/Imams/Pandits/Shamans?
No: an attack on a religion, must be along a religious dimension. It must assail the acceptance of that
religion in the terrain where it resides, which is not a material domain. I am not getting all Woo on you
here, I mean it is what a failed US Army initiative of some years back called "the Human terrain".
As Oliver Cromwell's kid found out, you can't run an effective theocracy when most of the people aren't
buying into your sh!t any more. You've lost the relevant terrain. If you can't seize and hold ground within
the belief system of some critical mass of the populace, you aren't, and aren't seen to be, a Theocratic
Regime, justified by upholding The True Belief, blah, blah, blah, but rather you've become, and so will in
God's Good Time be seen to be, a Religious Minority running a Tyranny. Big Difference. Much less able
to withstand all the other shocks a governing apparatus can face.
If you're with me so far, you will agree with me that, as a military matter, the religious dimension of the
conflict with the Cabal along its, as it were, Iranian front, is a neglected front. There may be opportunities
there. And let me cut to the chase: I think I've found one, and thought of a means of attack, and I want to
explain it to you in the rest of this TL;DR, "you wrote so much text" entry.
Consider this: as recently at 1500 years ago, within rounding error, the Iranians were all Zoroastarians.
Then they lost a battle (Yazd, I think), and basically were forcibly converted to -โ Sunni Islam. About
1000 years go by, within rounding error. The Safavids, or whoever the hell it was, decided they're going
to convert the whole thing over to -โ Shia Islam. Basically, this was all geopolitics: Ottoman Empire
ascendant, how do we, the Iranian government of the day, tell the Turks to fuck right off? Lightbulb: let's
all switch to Islam's Other Leading Brand. Whatever. The point of this paragraph is: Iranians have a long
history of Religious change.
Which brings me to 1844 I think it was, and the Bab. Miscellaneous history goes here, whatever. Then
the kill him, but too late, Baha'ullah is on the scene. And is a pain in the ass because he's gaining all
kinda converts, details omitted, and how dare he (eventually) claim to be the Best Thing since Sliced
Bread and Al Nabi Mohammed? Anyway, so they kick him out. "Go annoy the Turks! GTFO!" they said.
Something like that. I paraphrase. So, he goes off and annoys the Turks.
[continued next post]