Baker, none of those 'notables' were nominated by anons.
.
>The study, based on research conducted in China in January and February, found cats and ferrets highly susceptible to the virus when researchers attempted to infect the animals by introducing viral particles via the nose.
>Based on the evidence so far, WHO epidemiologist Maria Van Kerkhove told a news conference: “We don’t believe that they are playing a role in transmission but we think that they may be able to be infected from an infected person.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-pets/cats-can-catch-coronavirus-study-finds-prompting-who-investigation-idUSKCN21Q3DJ?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social
I am a little confused about the purpose of that post, but have noticed more and more, ppl jumping to conclusions when given only a little info and not using their analytical skills.
Also, Q did post this earlier today:
3912
8 Apr 2020 - 9:36:50 AM
Read and discern for yourself.
Q