Anonymous ID: 3ec065 April 9, 2020, 11:33 a.m. No.8735347   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8735076 pb

 

Don't we know that it's up to the Democrat Governors of states to decide what is considered a C19 death and what is not considered a C19 death? And don't we know that Democrat Governors are calling pneumonia deaths C19 deaths? And don't we know that people like Fausi and Brix are untrustworthy?

Anonymous ID: 3ec065 April 9, 2020, 11:52 a.m. No.8735675   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Methylene Blue is another potential treatment of C19.

 

Falls under the category of cheap, simple been around a long time.

 

It's an oxygenator. Hadn't heard about it before, saw someone talking about it within the context of the French study. Like many other options, there are pubmed studies about Methylene Blue and antiviral.

 

Methylene blue photoinactivation of RNA viruses.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15168794

 

We present a review of the current status of the use of methylene blue (MB) photoinactivation of viruses starting with the first early observations up to its current use to inactivate HIV-1 in blood products. Basic mechanism of action studies conducted with model bacteriophages indicate that MB-photomediated viral RNA-protein crosslinkage is a primary lesion and that oxygen, specifically singlet oxygen, is very important also.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16118025

 

Methylene blue photoinactivation abolishes West Nile virus infectivity in vivo.

 

Since MB is already approved for human use at a dose of 100mg/kg/day, we conjecture that MB+light treatment of blood products for high-risk patients will be efficacious and suitable for use in resource-limited settings.

 

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-17718/v1

 

Methylene blue photochemical treatment as a reliable SARS-CoV-2 plasma virus inactivation method for blood safety and convalescent plasma therapy for the COVID-19 outbreak