Anonymous ID: 5cc162 April 9, 2020, 11:33 a.m. No.8735352   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5535 >>5753 >>5924

They attack bakers that they don't want to bake, gaslight them and try to insinuate they are the bakers when they bake under guest pastebins. Rusty is Rainman, he teaches the baking class and uses a name/trip on /comms/ and he and his crew attack bakers that are not discord trannies with them. They use the rainman persona to get anons to ignore anyone that calls out baker gate keeping of valuable information in notables. It's actually pretty brilliant and has a 2-fold benefit, use rainman screaming to gaslight/harrass bakers not part of your crew to newfags and get anons to ignore anyone that speaks up when bakers gatekeep information due to rainmans constant sperging. Now we know why rainman shows up and attacks only certain bakers, it's the bakers Rusty and crew don't want baking. The only way for anons to stop Comped bakers is to learn to bake, I started baking because was tired of bakers leaving out good diggs with no explained reasoning, and generally responding with smart ass responses when questioned. The biggest and most effective way to stop the flow of information is to gain control of the baking, anons have to take back control.

 

>inb4 10 "anons" jump on me and ignore the evidence that's been presented

 

  1. Rainman gaslighting graphic used to attack baker

 

  1. Rusty admitting he was the person in the bread that rainman was attacking me in posting my pastebin account with no answer as to why

 

  1. Rusty claiming to have posted my pastebin account just cause he wanted people to know I was baking.

 

  1. Rusty in a separate bread piling on with rainman while I was baking

 

5 Rusty admitting he had no reason to post my pastebin account in bread for rainman to use to try to gaslight me as a bad baker.

Anonymous ID: 5cc162 April 9, 2020, 11:52 a.m. No.8735673   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8735535

>>8735535

  1. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations – as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

 

Keep trying, the more you shill with FALSE EVIDENCE more anons see what's going on.

Anonymous ID: 5cc162 April 9, 2020, 12:03 p.m. No.8735842   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8735753

>>8735753

>THAT is the correct motivation for baking: to serve Q, Q movement and POTUS by helping this board to function as optimally as possible.

 

Exactly, and serving Q is making sure information that anons may need in the future to piece together the puzzle are readily available.

 

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A PETTY GRIEVANCE IT HAS TO DO WITH LETTING ANONS KNOW WHO IS GAS LIGHTING BAKERS AND WHY

 

  1. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.