Anonymous ID: a9727f April 9, 2020, 1:57 p.m. No.8737295   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7391 >>7758

This dig was posted in the late nightshift and it was heavily attacked by shills

 

The "Human Farming Project" and the Michigan "American Blue Cross - Blue Shield" connection

 

Did a check in the "about" section on the "human farming" FB, prior to it being removed, and found a lead:

 

they have a phone number:

 

+1 800-437-6328

 

a google search gave an interesting 1st result:

 

https://www.bcbsm.com/providers/help/plan-documents-and-forms/pharmacy-services/blue-care-network/request-prescription-drug-coverage.html

 

Why would it give "the blue cross-blue shield network" of Michigan as a result?

 

a coincidence?

 

It is interesting to note that the page doesn't have the exact matching phone number, it has a match only in the first 2 number fields:

 

"+1 800-437"

 

If we plug only these fields ("+1 800-437") to google, all of a sudden we don't get the "blue cross" results.

 

this means one thing anons, THE NUMBER THAT THE FB PAGE WROTE, WAS DELIBERATELY GIVEN TO POINT THE Michigan BLUE CROSS WEBSITE!

 

I have no idea why they did it, but it is too much of a coincidence to think it wasn't deliberate. Is the Michigan Blue Cross network, a player in the child trafficking?

 

NEED MORE EYE HERE ANONS

 

for those who are skeptical, you can can google the numbers and see for yourselves.

Anonymous ID: a9727f April 9, 2020, 2:10 p.m. No.8737521   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7598 >>7763

>>8737391

 

hi shill/retard.

 

  1. Please explain why the 1st result LINKES TO THE BLUE CROSS DESPITE HAVING A DIFFERENT NUMBER?

 

  1. Please explain why WHEN LOOKING FOR THE NUMBER PART THAT DO MATCH, ALL OF A SUDDEN THE BLUE CROSS LINK IS NOWHERE TO BE FOUND?

 

Should I restate the questions using pictures for children?

I am happy to have helped.

Anonymous ID: a9727f April 9, 2020, 2:26 p.m. No.8737763   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7792

>>8737699

 

I provided source + a way for each and every other anon to reproduce my findings.

 

You provided zero refutes, as I stated here:

>>8737521

 

Case closed. Your shilling proves I'm over the target.

 

Don't worry, this topic will be dug much more than you can imagine.

 

now kys shill.