Anonymous ID: 01bc4e April 9, 2020, 3:04 p.m. No.8738247   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8332 >>8361 >>8574 >>8612 >>8673

CRY FOR MY BELOVED NWO    

 

A Comparative Re-analysis of Kissinger's 4/23 WSJ OpEd & Qpost 3916's Kissinger Quote.

 

Kissinger argues, in what is destined to be one of his final pleas to the internationalist faithful, that the only hope for a world overwhelmed by a global pandemic is to save/restore [their plan] of an emergent global order.

 

Let's begin by looking @ the tone he sets in his opening (i.e. important terms emphasized w/ single quotation marks):

 

"The surreal atmosphere of the Covid-19 pandemic calls to mind how I felt as a young man in the 84th Infantry Division during the Battle of the Bulge. Now, as in late 1944, there is a sense of 'inchoate danger', aimed not at any particular person, but striking randomly and with devastation… American endurance then was fortified by an ultimate national purpose. Now, in a divided country, efficient and farsighted government is necessary to overcome obstacles unprecedented in magnitude and global scope.  

 

*Note how HK opens by drawing a parallel between the atmosphere created by the global pandemic and his experience in the in 'Battle of the Bulge'. Notable that the Battle of the Bulge was the LAST major German offensive campaign on the Western Front during World War II. Naturally, HK and his puppet masters have cast themselves in the role of Nazi's because that is who they are. Thus the  'global pandemic event' is [their] last major offensive in hopes of resurrecting ' the plan' from Qpost 3916 (attached).  Thus, this is a timeline marker –  he is communicating to the internationalist co-conspirators. Also note his phrase, "there is a sense of 'inchoate' danger".  An inchoate offense is a preliminary crime, or an incomplete crime, as in a crime of preparing for or seeking to commit another crime. The crime of conspiracy is an inchoate offense – definitely a marker. 

 

*Now let's review below:

 

"The reality is the world will never be the same after the coronavirus. To argue now about the past only makes it harder to do what has to be done. "

 

*Notice how HK tries to persuade his readers that a new post corona virus world order is an 'inevitability' &  an inescapable reality, which he proceeds to substantiate w/ a catalog of fake/exaggerated data.   In the paragraph below, his real appeal/goal is openly stated:

 

"The ultimate test will be whether the virus’s spread can be arrested and then reversed in a manner and at a scale that 'maintains public confidence in Americans’ ability to govern themselves'. The crisis effort, however vast and necessary, must not crowd out the urgent task of launching a parallel enterprise 'for the transition to the post-corona virus order'…

 

*Note how he questions the American People's ability to GOVERN THEMSLEVES'. This is always the internationalists' central theme.  He is taking direct aim at the American People – because we are the primary blockade standing against the forced institutionalization of [their plan]. This OpEd is a direct attack on the American People & manifest destiny – a Nat Sec threat.  In quote below, notice how he equates 'enlightenment values' with global trade and the trans-national movement of people (i.e. internationalism/open-borders), and that Nationalistic views are essentially medieval:

 

"Third, safeguard the principles of the liberal world order…  'Enlightenment thinkers' reframed this concept, arguing that the purpose of the legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the people: security, order, economic well-being, and justice.  'Individuals cannot secure these things on their own'. The pandemic has prompted an anachronism, 'a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people'. 

 

*In his closing, he brings it back to WWII's Battle of the Bulge:

 

"We went on from the Battle of the Bulge into a world of growing prosperity and enhanced human dignity… The historic challenge for leaders is to manage the crisis while building the future. 'Failure could set the world on fire'. 

 

*Note he closes w/ the concept that if we don't embrace this new post pandemic world, the world will be destroyed (i.e. set fire) on a number of fronts – another direct threat..  

 

The failing old guard is pulling out all the stops now…in this, their Battle of the Bulge & last major offensive.

 

https://archive.ph/vD6jr (no pay wall WSJ OpEd) 

 

Cross Reference w/ this OpEd: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/mar/28/coronavirus-crisis-fit-new-world-order/