>>8735398 (pb)(Q) — FISA INDICTMENTS = START

>>8735349 (pb)(Q) — Data exchange(s) can be very dangerous.

What I heard from Q.

• These two posts go together, thusly:

>What happens when state actor(s) [assets] are removed?

>How does a state actor gain leverage over a person in power [re: blackmail]?

→ [DS assets/bad actors] = Removed / Neutralized

→ [Blackmail] "roadblocks" = Neutralized

So,

FISA INDICTMENTS = START

—

Pieces in place.

Ducks lining up.

PAIN Incoming.

What if 'impeachment' was meant to fail?

What if 'impeachment' was meant to distract from overseas developments?

(We saw things habbening in Wuhan in 2019)

Anons,

Think of the (WW) Outrage if it was disclosed that:

Impeachment was a BIG DISTRACTION.

The [DS] put on a big (Trump Impeachment Charade) so it would distract from [their] orchestration of the COVID-19 pandemic.

With [their] real intent all along; not to remove POTUS by impeachment, but to initiate a (WW) "Mass-Panic" Mass Casualty Event to bring in the:

GATTACA / 1984 = Kissinger mentioned at Bilderberg in 1992.