Anonymous ID: 4cf16c April 9, 2020, 4:41 p.m. No.8739455   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9520 >>9526 >>9530 >>9532 >>9568 >>9609 >>9844 >>9952 >>0021 >>0046 >>0138

Anons getting the picture yet?

 

Want to know why your great diggs are disregarded and ridiculed? Bakers dismiss notables and call the information a slide only to then post said information on their twitter accounts to take credit and gain a following. Now anons know why when you work your ass off on a great dig you are ridiculed and accused of being a slide. It's so bakers union fags can post the info on twitter and take credit. STRANGE ISN"T IT.

 

>inb4 "anons" just down my throat and ad hominem attack

 

>inb4 you have to go back Linda

 

>inb4 fuck you REEEEEE

Anonymous ID: 4cf16c April 9, 2020, 4:59 p.m. No.8739631   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9675

>>8739568

I'm not talking about my diggs, I get notables constantly and could care less, I have around 5 today. They mean nothing except to anons that work hard on a digg, post it, get ridiculed and demoralized so the bakers can claim credit and then stop digging and posting.

 

My digs get spread far and wide without ever needing a twitter account.

Anonymous ID: 4cf16c April 9, 2020, 5:27 p.m. No.8739946   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Even though Q has never said anything was going to happen on 04/10/20 shills are pushing it hard as hell saying that if nothing goes down tomorrow Q is BTFO. It won't matter but they are doing anything they can to discredit Q, what else is new I guess.

Anonymous ID: 4cf16c April 9, 2020, 5:30 p.m. No.8739977   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8739937

Y U mad bruh?

 

Also, the graphic up there are none my diggs, but they weren't the bakers diggs either. That's the issue. Q has used my special-ness a few different times. And the best part, I don't have to steal from other anons to get recognized.