Anonymous ID: c1f5f1 April 9, 2020, 7:29 p.m. No.8741315   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1350 >>1631

>>8741238

What it means is that they cooked the projection of deaths and the virus is by no means as devastating as portrayed in forcing POTUS into a full economic shutdown.

 

Social distancing is merely one relatively small factor in the lower morbidity rate.

 

There’s more to this. We’re beginning to see that unavoidable conclusion.

 

POTUS will crush those who manipulated this pandemic to gain the policy response they were seeking.

 

And if there was a bioterror event in NYC to juice up the losses, there will be no mercy and neither should there be.

Anonymous ID: c1f5f1 April 9, 2020, 7:41 p.m. No.8741441   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>8741362

It’s part of a psychological operation. It’s testing boundaries and mental states. This is not humans chit-chatting on social media. A decade of socmed programming has prevented many from appreciating what’s going on with this communication channel.

 

Nothing is personal. Everything is calculated.

Anonymous ID: c1f5f1 April 9, 2020, 7:48 p.m. No.8741528   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1591 >>1670

>>8741396

This quote has always struck me as illogical and contradictory. The purpose of vaccines is primarily to save lives. Saving lives means more people. Not the outcome Gates clearly desires.

 

So did he let the cat out of the bag? Are “his vaccines” toxic and actually result in deaths? Or, perhaps more plausibly, do Gates vaccines incorporate other “treatments,” such as chemical sterilization or other fertility disrupters?