>>8742570 ty baker
>>8742416 pb
>>8742455 pb
>>8742507 pb
>no you didn't ego man
>From my friend who recently became an RN at a local hospital. We are in the Southwest in a city under 1 million and over 500,000. Things in [brackets are my additions or edits of dox info] to this text exchange on my phone.
>
>[I congratulate him on his engagement]
>
>Thanks bro. We are really excited.
>
>God is good always. Please stay safe
>
> and don't venture out unless it's for fuel
>
> and food. Rachel [his finace] has 4 patients die last
>
>night in [local hospital 1] ER. Three of which she
>
>was there to help try to keep them alive
>
>Are they using the malaria drug + antibiotic?
>
>Anecdotally we hear it is useful but I
>
>can't confirm anything. My unit moves
>
>[***]positive patients to a higher acuity unit
>
>after they have received a chest X-ray
>
>with what are called "ground glass "
>
>artifacts in the patients lungs.[***] I have
>
> seen patients be COMPLETELY
>
>without symptoms and have loc (level
>
>of consciousness changes) which can
>
> be caused by poor oxygenation.
>
>Usually it manifest as anxiety.
>
>I am hopeful that the combination of
>
> the two meds help. The problem I
>
>hear is that patients de sat - the[y] lose
>
>oxygen carrying capacity much faster
>
> than usual. The window for
>
>intervention is very narrow. And I can
>
>confirm that between [local hospital 1] and
>
>[local hospital 2] there is less than 50 ventilators
>
> and less than 200 test available
>
>
>
> I'm of the opinion that hospitals
>
>narrow wide and locally and very
>
>much unprepared for an all our worst
>
>case scenario of this break out
>
>The weird thing about the test it's it's
>
>70% false positive. I was told this by one
>
>of the physicians I work for. And insurances
>
>arnt paying for the test. I understand trump
>
>said it would be covered but it actually
>
>cost 200 minimum
>
>And they are very very picky on who gets the test
>
>Who was making the faulty tests? Were they US made?
>
>No clue on the manufacturer. The physician just said it's so inconsistent
>
>How do they know which ones have given faulty results? Do they test against some known standard?
>
>They exhibit all the signs and symptoms with a positive chest xray. But the test is neg so they retest
>
>So shortness of breath fever cough etc?
>
>Yeah but the sob is what the main difference
>
>So in your mind it truly is something we've never seen before?
>
>Yes. It is insidious in its manifestations. And thus it is afforded this huge window of time to spread. It is also very taxing on the bodies of those with other disease processes and elderly. It is not a refined virus that is to say that the longer a virus can keep its host alive the better for the virus. I think they call that virility
>
>One last question - would love to ask Steph this one-with the genome segment that china gave us, would there be enough there to detetmine whether it was engineered or not? I would guess no, because that would be so stupid.
>
>Personally I am of the belief that the Chinese either engineered this or discovered it on accident. I can send you a video that is really illuminating as to why I think that. Let me send it to you really quick
>
>[he couldnt get his hands on the video at this time]
>
>The other really fucked up thing is the numbered. China's numbers are so low they HAVE to be fake. 3500 deaths ? That city where it broke out is at a mil in population.
>
>They had LINES of people miles long trying to collect ashes of their loved ones.
>
>Multiple strains?
>
>So far there are 2 strains of true virus. It's gonna keep mutating
>
>___
>
>that's our discussion re: the plandemic