still here, doc. Try to stick around when the shillin' is bad and i saw their stuff on you–then saw they were gunning for me too. Idiot shills, trying to fuck up the board. Bred prior to mine had 3 bakers, weird stuff. who will do the next bake? looks like you've got two possible takers. God bless this bread and protect all who post upon it. Godspeed, fren.
o7
don't know but did you give feedback to baker about this last bread?
GTFO and take your SHILL FRENS with you
calling any baker–or anon–a "slimy cunt"
is as LOW as it GOES
your behavior is disgusting, anon.
You have nothing to offer here.
yeah, espec. one.
got your back, doc.
fight's getting vicious, no quarter given.
They did if before, they lost before, they'll lose again.
too tired to bake but can still watch, at least for a while. could get interdasting in here.
o7
Considering what's coming down on this board right now, that whiny post sends me kekking.
This is what it was like last year, only we are stronger than before. We are all one - bakers, anons, all who love freedom. Bakers just targeted because we support infrastructure of the board - like highways and bridges.
o7
Gosh, the guy who responded first to your post proves your point. Well said, anon.
Small business owners are also the ones who think for themselves. i think big biz, big pol, big med, and every other 'big' is about to get a rude awakening–when they see just what all the 'little' people can do when you given them something worth fighting for.
what Q drop?
Hmmm…..
another anon posted….have to say, hard to ignore.
suggest you just take it all with a grain of salt
baker it's been pointed out the the lack of a # in bread number likely causes problems for scrappers like wearethene.ws. Can you please use the traditional # in your notables (up top, too)? Thank you.
no, it's the numbering of each notable bun within the notables page.
sorry, to be clear:
both #'s are requested, along with the colon after the bred title.
bread title:
Q Research General #0000: Your Bread Title Here! Edition
on notables page:
#11195
[notables]
.
.
.
#11195
#11194
[notables]
.
.
.
#11194
etc.
Comes in waves.
yeah, we were talking about how people like to change it up, but once a tradition is established, it creates markers that people use for practical purposes. i am trying to corral some of this stuff so it's clear how this works–what matters and what doesn't.
o7
bold has always been there, it's not a problem. Neither is putting in "baker change" or "ghost bake" inside each bread's notables list. I asked specifically about that.
But they are not too happy when we screw up the numbers on the notables page either - heard about that last night, kek.
Excuse me have to go, see that someone is calling me a shill baker, time to respond.
o7
Baker, I am the "shill baker" to whom this poster refers. You can decide what you want to include or exclude on your own. Sauce was non-existent, which is why i did not notable. But these anon analyses are the toughest calls to make. And no matter what you do, you will eventually run afoul of shills at some point–just part of the game.
>blame just the shill who removed it.
That would be me anon
after discussion with anons on the board.
which you know if you were there.
Was originally brought up as a problem by an anon–and after much consideration I first removed it and then put it up for consideration by anons on the board. In the process, asked how the poster–who was present–knew these claims about Rachel Chandler etc were true.
No answer.
So now you are reposting. Fine–that's your privilege.
But your are a liar and cheat to go after this baker when you know the truth about what really happened.
it's about scrapping req'ts. I need to try to codify so we understand what really matters and what doesn't. Trying to get it all together.
bad namefags bad!