>>874485

no difference

either way it was part of THE PLAN

>>874512

done many times

lawfag here

anons nothing barry did will be undone even if it is proven he is not a us citizin fraud whatever

no courts will not touch that

they will all defer with some version of action under color of law

that is not what Q means

all the US attorneys get fired on new pres of different party

most stay on as interim just as huber did

then potus picks the ones he wants

its a political process so the answer to Q question is that he wanted huber approved by the senate which he was

no controversy it was a voice vote so there you go

>>874596

>>874524

yes this is correct

>>874648

maybe what Q is saying is that sessions did NOT recuse because of russia or election that session did but only because of DOJ rules that apply when he already made public comments about the matter during the campaign

>>874756

yes i recall that - q knows that so why refer to a specific doj reg?

what i was saying is sessions must have known of and commented on a criminal investigation into the election or russia

otherwise how do the two - q post and sessions statement - fit together?

>>874766

yes all is proven!

tee hee

>

>>874824