Anonymous ID: 4900c6 April 10, 2020, 6:49 a.m. No.8745179   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8744951

TY Baker!!!

 

Started seeing "Near Earth Object" type of shit in muh twitter feed from randos. Guess what they are gearing us up for next? Brace yourselves, anons. It's going to start getting intergalactically shilly in here.

 

>>8744928 (lb)

>>8744307 (lb)

 

https://themostbeautifulworld.com/blog/comet-atlas

It's a diversion. It's in the sky.

Anonymous ID: 4900c6 April 10, 2020, 7:17 a.m. No.8745387   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5449

>>8745337

I think anon's intentions were to shame the Nike shit that was going on for a bit. Perhaps you could still salvage the message:

Believe in truth, even if it matters sacrificing everything.

 

Better?

Anonymous ID: 4900c6 April 10, 2020, 7:24 a.m. No.8745454   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5553 >>5684

>>8745420

>>8745420

Notable Question

If not, where are the grieving families? Were are all the private services around the Country?

 

Seems to me the MSM has a narrative plot hole. Watch for the news to get FLOODED with this, now that it's been brought up a couple of times, here.

Anonymous ID: 4900c6 April 10, 2020, 7:53 a.m. No.8745702   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8745194

>>8745359

I think you have good intentions, but:

 

There are bots/shills that thank bakers, and there are anons that thank bakers. There are bots/shills that post nudes, and there are anons that do/don't. It's not up to any one person to claim an authoritative position in how others conduct themselves. If you want to play that game, there's a Church in Italy you'd fit right in with.

 

Ever heard of "retweets/notables" do not = endorsements? There are real people behind many of the posts. Many people are still struggling with the extent of the programming of pop culture, and want to express what they can in the best way they know how. Having the vice principle come around and smack the shit out of them for trying to participate discourages would-be contributors more than playing the plank/speck game.

 

Put it to you another way:

I can tell by your 40 posts (I've had to change that count 3 times while writing this) that you're vastly concerned with how others conduct themselves, especially if you know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that people who are invested in the continuance of revealing the truth are as dedicated to contributing, being thankful, and digging, meme'ing, praying, and trying to improve themselves, and the world, and this is the only conduit they see is helping. Can you accept those with good intentions in their heart even if they have habits you don't approve of?

 

Reflect what you want on yourself, and do what you think you can do to be better. Let everyone else do the same, and decide, for themselves, who are the anons vs shills, is the mature position. Nobody on this earth can claim a moral authority over another. Nobody. Read this again:

John 8:7

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."

 

Are you the moral authority, or are you the person that seeks truth and understanding? If you are concerned for these people so much, perhaps intercessory prayer is your best recourse. Casting stones is something we're supposed to be above doing.